The answer to the question makes us have to go to 2009, where the story begins. And is that Intel, AMD and NVIDIA have a very peculiar relationship that depends on who is above whom, since the one who dictates most of the rules is the fastest in theory and in practice. In 2009 Intel and NVIDIA were in court fights over certain patent and market agreements over the nForce of the greens and after settling the account with a negative balance of 1,500 million, Intel ended NVIDIA’s relationship with an agreement for that amount in no less than 6 years.
Why pay if you are supposedly right? Freedom has a price
Intel did not want to continue with NVIDIA and the agreements signed accusing it of various tricks to maintain the monopoly and other minutiae involved. Basically, the blue team wanted to break with the green for a very simple reason: with that agreement they could not mount another GPU that was not NVIDIA.
The rupture left the door open for those of Pat Gelsinger and as such, Intel and AMD began to work together shortly after and continued to collaborate in a very curious alliance that has had an outcome known to all. The last Intel processor with AMD iGPU was the i7-8809G, a 4-core 8-thread CPU at 14nm with Kaby Lake-G architecture that included a Radeon RX Vega M GH a 1190 MHz with 24 CU, where it was also the case that there was a second iGPU Intel HD 630 in the encapsulation.
That break with NVIDIA fueled Intel’s strategy to dominate the global GPU market today, as the Blues learned from their rivals, acquired the know-how, hired the right staff, and began researching and designing a modular architecture for the future. while little by little they were catching up with Lisa Su’s in this section.
Intel laptop with AMD GPU, NVIDIA had to abandon
The result was simple: NVIDIA left the iGPUs as such and the chipsets, Intel took that gap, designed its own, integrated them into the processor as a full-blown APU, allied with its rival to learn from it and now It does not depend on anyone and plans to deliver a final blow to the red team and stand up to the green.
Therefore, Intel does not have the need to purchase RX 6000 GPUs currently for computers that mount its CPUs. They currently have better iGPUs than AMD and Lisa Su’s also don’t compete in performance / watt / drives with NVIDIA. The RX 6000 They are competent, they are efficient and they are cheaper than a rival GPU, but the stock is very limited.
The answer to this is supposedly secretly signed contracts between Intel and NVIDIA to push AMD out of the market. Both companies have denied this many times, but it is true that we are not going to see an Intel CPU versus an AMD GPU in the same laptop … If we add to this the number of NVIDIA models and variants and the 4 models available in AMD, why would Intel opt for the red team if it competes directly with them and on top of that they have an equally fast gaming product?